ICAI  |  Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB)  |  Self-Evaluation Utility

Sustainability Reporting Maturity Model (SRMM)

A structured self-evaluation utility developed by the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB), ICAI, to help service-sector entities assess their sustainability reporting maturity, benchmark their current practices and identify opportunities for enhancing their sustainability performance and reporting practices.

Version 3.2 Service Sector Self-Evaluation Utility 300-Mark Assessment

Disclaimer: This Self-Evaluation Utility has been prepared by the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB), ICAI, to assist entities in assessing their sustainability reporting maturity under the Sustainability Reporting Maturity Model (SRMM) – Service Sector, Version 3.2. The scoring criteria and maturity levels provided in this utility are intended for self-evaluation purposes. The utility is intended to support entities in identifying areas of strength, understanding gaps and opportunities for improvement, and progressing towards higher levels of sustainability reporting maturity.

About this Utility
Purpose

The SRMM Service Sector Self-Evaluation Utility enables an entity to assess its sustainability reporting maturity in a structured and consistent manner based on the parameters prescribed under SRMM Version 3.2 – Service Sector.

The utility converts the entity's responses against the prescribed scoring criteria into section-wise and overall scores and indicates the corresponding sustainability reporting maturity level.

What This Utility Covers

The utility assesses the entity across three broad areas:

  • Section A – General Disclosures and Management Procedures
  • Section B – Sustainability Reporting and Performance Assessment
  • Section C – Sustainability Leadership and Strategic Initiatives

The overall assessment comprises 300 marks, distributed as follows:

Section Parameters Maximum Score
Section A General Disclosures and Management Procedures 40
Section B Sustainability Reporting and Performance Assessment 200
Section C Sustainability Leadership and Strategic Initiatives 60
Total 300
Key Features
  • Section-wise self-evaluation of sustainability reporting maturity
  • Scoring based on predefined criteria for each indicator
  • Automatic calculation of section-wise and overall scores
  • Minimum eligibility threshold of 30% in each section
  • Identification of parameters that have not yet been scored
  • Automatic determination of the overall maturity level
Objective

The objective of this utility is to enable service-sector entities to:

  • assess their current level of sustainability reporting maturity;
  • identify gaps in environmental, social and governance performance;
  • identify opportunities for strengthening sustainability practices and disclosures; and
  • understand their progression towards higher levels of sustainability reporting maturity.
Utility Version
3.2
Developed By
SRSB, ICAI
Feedback & Query
sustainability@icai.in
When Should the Utility Be Used?

The utility may be used by a service-sector entity as part of its periodic internal self-assessment of sustainability reporting maturity.

An entity may undertake the assessment:

  • as part of an annual sustainability reporting review;
  • to assess the maturity of its responsible business and value-chain practices;
  • to review customer, data privacy and cybersecurity-related sustainability practices;
  • to monitor improvement in sustainability reporting maturity over time.

The assessment may be repeated periodically to track progress and compare the entity's performance across reporting periods.

Assessment Structure
Section A – General Disclosures and Management Procedures Max 40

Section A assesses the foundational aspects of sustainability reporting, including general organisational disclosures, sustainability governance, policies, responsibilities and management procedures.

Section B – Sustainability Reporting and Performance Assessment Max 200

Section B represents the largest component of the assessment and evaluates the entity's sustainability reporting and performance across key environmental, social, governance, workforce, human rights, customer and service-sector-specific parameters.

The assessment is organised across the following areas:

Section B represents the largest component of the assessment and evaluates the entity's sustainability reporting and performance across a broad range of environmental, social and governance parameters.

The assessment includes areas such as:

Ethics, governance and anti-corruption Environmental performance Energy and emissions Occupational health and safety Human resources and employee-related practices Human rights Value chain and responsible sourcing Product responsibility and customer-related matters Diversity, equality and community engagement

The section is designed to assess both the extent of disclosure and the maturity of sustainability-related practices and performance.

Section C – Sustainability Leadership and Strategic Initiatives Max 60

Section C assesses the extent to which sustainability considerations are embedded into the entity's strategy, risk management, operations, digital ecosystem and long-term decision-making.

The section covers areas including:

climate-related physical and transition risks and opportunities Science-Based Targets, Net Zero commitments and climate targets carbon credits and offsets circular economy and responsible digital economy strategies Service Lifecycle Assessments or similar environmental footprint assessments refurbishment, reuse and responsible disposal of IT hardware and office equipment supplier/vendor ESG Codes of Conduct and responsible sourcing ESG assessments of value-chain partners and outsourced service providers CSR expenditure and strategic sustainability themes sustainability-linked financial instruments and green financing integration of ESG, digital, data governance and cybersecurity risks into risk management alignment of ESG reporting and sustainability initiatives with the UN Sustainable Development Goals
How Does the Scoring Work?
  • Each parameter in the utility has a prescribed scoring criterion and maximum score.
  • The entity should review the applicable disclosure or practice and enter the score corresponding to the level achieved against the prescribed criterion.
  • The score entered for each parameter should not exceed its specified maximum score.

The utility automatically aggregates the scores to determine:

  • Section-wise score
  • Section-wise percentage
  • Parameters not yet scored
  • Overall score
  • Overall percentage
  • Eligibility for the SRMM assessment
  • Overall sustainability reporting maturity level
Minimum Eligibility Requirement

To qualify for an overall SRMM maturity level, the entity is required to achieve a minimum score of 30% in each of the three sections.

If the Minimum Threshold Is Not Met

If the entity does not achieve the minimum 30% threshold in any one of the three sections, the overall assessment will be shown as: Not Eligible (minimum 30% not achieved in one or more sections).

Where the minimum threshold is achieved in all three sections, the entity will be assigned the applicable maturity level based on its overall score.

Important Notes on Self-Evaluation

The utility is intended to facilitate a structured self-evaluation and should be completed based on the entity's actual disclosures, policies, practices, systems and performance during the relevant reporting period.

Entities should:

  • apply the scoring criteria consistently;
  • retain appropriate supporting documentation for the scores assigned;
  • ensure that the information considered relates to the relevant reporting period;
  • avoid assigning scores higher than the prescribed maximum;
  • appropriately consider parameters that are not applicable to the entity; and
  • review the assessment periodically to monitor improvements in sustainability maturity.

Entities should provide the Remarks / Basis for Score wherever appropriate to record the basis, evidence or rationale supporting the score assigned.

Interpretation of Results

The score generated by the utility should be viewed as an indication of the entity's sustainability reporting maturity based on the parameters assessed.

A higher score indicates a greater degree of development and integration of sustainability-related disclosures, practices and processes. However, the overall score should not be considered in isolation.

Entities should also review the section-wise results and individual parameter scores to understand the specific areas contributing to the overall maturity level and the areas requiring further development.

Reference

Sustainability Reporting Maturity Model (SRMM) – Service Sector, Version 3.2

Developed by the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI).

Publisher: Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB), ICAI

Maturity Levels

The SRMM Service Sector assessment uses four maturity levels:

Maturity Level Overall Score
Level 1 – Formative >30% to ≤50%
Level 2 – Developing >50% to ≤65%
Level 3 – Emerging >65% to ≤80%
Level 4 – Established >80% to 100%
Level 1 – Formative
>30% to ≤50%

The entity has initiated sustainability reporting and related practices, with foundational systems, disclosures and processes beginning to emerge.

Level 2 – Developing
>50% to ≤65%

The entity has established a broader sustainability reporting framework and demonstrates developing systems, processes and disclosures across key sustainability areas.

Level 3 – Emerging
>65% to ≤80%

The entity demonstrates a more integrated approach to sustainability reporting and performance, with stronger governance, measurement, management practices and strategic integration.

Level 4 – Established
>80% to 100%

The entity demonstrates a mature and integrated sustainability approach, with sustainability considerations embedded into governance, strategy, risk management, performance management and decision-making.

1

Enter Assessment Details

2

Evaluate Section A

3

Evaluate Section B

4

Evaluate Section C

5

Review the Summary

6

Review Areas for Improvement

Completing the SRMM Service Sector Self-Evaluation Utility involves the following steps:

Step 1

Enter Assessment Details

Enter the following information in the Assessment Details section:

  • Name of the Entity
  • Sector
  • Financial Year under review
  • Date of Assessment

These details will automatically populate the relevant sections of the utility.

Step 2

Evaluate Section A

Review each parameter under General Disclosures and Management Procedures and enter the score applicable to the entity based on the prescribed scoring criteria.

Step 3

Evaluate Section B

Assess the entity against the sustainability reporting and performance indicators covering environmental, social, governance, workforce, human rights, customer, digital and service-sector-specific aspects and enter the applicable scores.

Step 4

Evaluate Section C

Assess the entity's sustainability leadership, strategic initiatives and integration of sustainability considerations into business, risk management, technology, value chain and service delivery.

Step 5

Review the Summary

The Summary section automatically presents:

  • Section-wise maximum score
  • Minimum score required
  • Score obtained
  • Percentage scored
  • Parameters not yet scored
  • Section-wise eligibility
  • Overall score
  • Overall eligibility
  • Overall maturity level
Step 6

Review Areas for Improvement

The entity may use the results to identify parameters with lower scores or those not yet scored and consider appropriate measures for strengthening its sustainability reporting, performance and management practices.

For feedback, suggestions or queries relating to the SRMM Service Sector Self-Evaluation Utility, users may contact the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB), ICAI at: sustainability@icai.in